Dear Dr. Klaus,
Are you editing the latest version of your manual?
I like prevention before nearsightedness rather than prevention from getting
worse.
Sincerely,
Steve Leung
******
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 11:06 AM
Subject: Fw: reply
Dear Dr. Schmid,
I would like to emphasize the imperative use of plus lens for prevention.
Now, I encourage my own child put on +1.50 at time of read and write . Of
course, she has perfect vision and only at the age 4.
Steve Leung
*******
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 1:46 PM
Subject: reply
Dear Dr. Schmid,
Undercorrection is a way to minimise the bad effect of minus lens for myopic
subject.
I suggest fogging with plus lens prior to any start of myopia at time of
near-work.
Prevention is the best.
I believe myopia is developed because of tensed ciliary muscle which leading
to axial myopia. Fogging with a plus lens is the same idea as undercorrection
to myopes. Perhaps, permanent fogging to a new born eye might result into
deprivation myopia. And I believe that once the new born eye is fully
visually stimulated in the first few years of life, deprivation myopia
should not be taken place for any reason.
I recommend fogging for part of the time but not permanent nor constant. For
myopes, I do recommend them to put on plus lens on top of regular glasses (i.e
undercorrection) as frequent as possible. The stronger plus lens, the
maximun relaxation. But definitely not permanent. They all felt slight
improvement of vision with the plus lens gone. Plus lens is the most
effective way of early myopia correction but not minus lens
compensation.
I myself is nearsighted, I regret I had not
been given a plus lens either for far fogging or near reading when I was a
young boy at the age of 11. I wish I could have had the chance
of prevention or even recovery.
sincerely,
Steve Leung